PAP Returned Congress’ Debt

By failing the motion to call an extraordinary meeting of parliament on the case of Harsnakar Prosperous Armenia returned its debt to the Congress owing since the parliamentary elections.

The Armenian National Congress, announcing about the initiative and knowing very well that the PAP would not join it, sent the latter into a tough situation. The PAP’s excuse is that its MPs were abroad to make the situation even worse for the party.

But at the same time, the Prosperous Armenia claimed responsible for the failure of the motion that was so unpleasant for Ruben Hayrapetyan and the ruling party, releasing the Congress of accountability.

So the PAP returned the responsibility which the Congress had claimed for the PAP in the parliamentary elections by covering up vote buying by the PAP, referring to the lack of facts.

With or without facts, almost everyone knows what happened. But the Congress kept ignoring the “needle” of the PAP, even needles that were as big as tractors.

Now the PAP thanks the Congress and returns the debt by claiming responsibility.

But the Congress and the PAP are not equal yet since the Congress still accounts for the PAP apparently for the sake of the tradition. The point is that the Congress does not dare say the PAP is responsible for what happened because it is evident that the PAP thwarted the motion for an extraordinary meeting of parliament.

But apparently the Congress didn’t care for the session. Frequent rumors and assessments make it clear that the Congress has nothing to tell the oligarchs but they have something to tell the Congress.

The best option for the society would be if everyone said what they know about everyone. The more dirt floats, the easier will be to clean it up.

The more and faster the political field of Armenia stuck in deals is revealed, the more the Armenian society will rid of stereotypes and myths and wrong perceptions, illusions related to the current political class which may bring into being a new political class based on civil values not in words but in thinking and psychology.